|
You might discover that you need to send an e-mail or a letter in Spanish altho you are starting to learn Spanish. Perhaps a note to reserve a room for your dream vacation in Venezuela. Or an e-mail to a new buddy in Buenos Aires. Regardless of your motivations for writing in Spanish, letter and e-mail writing – in any language – tend to be rather formulaic. You will have to efficaciously be competent to get started writing letters to almost every one in Spanish when you learn the most usual letter-writing methods in Spanish. The most usual methods to write a letter in Spanish and a good deal of tips are listed below:
Dates
A business or a formal letter lists the date in the right-hand side. The days are written first. The month and the year follow with the preposition “de” in among both spaces. Therefore July 1, 2010 is written in Spanish as 1 de julio de 2010. Months of the year, days of the week and names of languages are not capitalized in Spanish.
E-mails and informal letters, as in English, are not quintessentially dated.
Opening
You could begin with casual greetings in casual letters. Some of the examples are:
Hola = Hello
Hola a todos = Hello everyone
Querido Antonio = Dear Antonio
Querida Marta = Dear Marta
Queridos Pablo y Victoria = Dear Pablo and Victoria
Queridos Señores Bueno = Dear Mr. and Mrs. Bueno
In business correspondence, you might open with:
Estimado Señor Martínez = Dear Mr. Martínez
Estimado Señor = Dear Sir
Estimada Señora Espinosa = Dear Ms. Espinosa
Estimada Señora = Dear Madam
Or for exceedingly formal letters:
Muy Señor Mío = Dear Sir
Muy Señora Mía = Dear Madam
Muy Señores Míos = Dear Sirs
Body
As you would assume, the body of the letter is where things get more free form.. You may articulate the intention for making the letter in this part. You may express what it is you wish to say on this percentage of the letter. However, a few universal terminology you might find utile for making informal e-mails and letters are:
Adjunto = I am attaching (in an e-mail) / I am enclosing (in a letter)
Gracias por = Thank you for
Nos vemos pronto. = We’ll see each other soon.
Common expressions in formal communications include:
Quería reservar = I would like to reserve
El motivo de esta carta es = The reason for this letter is
Nos complace comunicarle = We are pleased to inform you
Nos complace comunicarles = (If writing to more than one person) We are pleased to inform you
Estamos agradecidos por su interés en = We be grateful for your interest in
Estoy agradecido por su interés en = (If you as the speaker are a man) I be grateful for your interest in
Estoy agradecida por su interés en = (If you are a woman) I be grateful for your interest in
Close
As a rule, a warm or a polite is employed to end a letter followed by your name. Expressions like “Un saludo”, “Un beso”, or “Un abrazo” are ofttimes used to end casual letters. The standard approach to end a business or formal letter written in Spanish is with the phrase “Un cordial saludo”. Other phrases like “Sinceramente”, “Cordialmente”, or “Le saluda atentamente”.
Hamlet Universales Universal Letters Spanish
Often credited with creating a frequent movie audience for Shakespeare, Kenneth Branagh has wanted for a heap of years to fetch to the screen the complete, full-length version of Hamlet. His desire becomes a reality when this epic drama, featuring an all-star cast and developed and directed by Branagh, comes to theaters this fall. This tie-in book includes Branagh’s Introduction and screenplay, a production diary, color stills, and more.
From Library JournalThe big H comes to Penguin’s great revamped “Pelican Shakespeare” line. What else do you need to know? Buy it!
Copyright 2002 Cahners Business Information, Inc.
Review
“For those whose scholarship extends beyond the ordinary one-volume editions, this Hibbard Hamlet will prove the most arousing and attention holding of the decade.” –Reg Saner, University of Colorado, Boulder
Language NotesText: Spanish
Hamlet Universales Universal Letters Spanish Picture
Hamlet Universales Universal Letters Spanish Picture
Hamlet Universales Universal Letters Spanish Image
Hamlet Universales Universal Letters Spanish Photo
Most helpful client reviews
38 of 44 persons found the following review helpful.
 Golden Gate to Shakespeare
By Night Owl
Bravo to the writers, editors, and publishers of the entire No Fear Shakespeare series. Rendering Shakespeare into prosaic, conversational American English not only explains what Shakespeare was saying, but reveals how much better he said it! Here’s a few examples from HAMLET:
11 of 13 humans found the following review helpful.
No Words to Describe
By Nemo
There is little need to review the actual text: it is undoubtedly (along with a great deal of other of Shakespeare’s plays) an exceedingly influential work of the humane mind, and very well may be the best work of creative writing of recognized artisti value ever written, period.
The actual activity of formally presenting something and annotation of the text is rather indivdual as well. Whereas most annotated texts of Shakespeare place annotations on the other side of the page, here they are at the bottom. Considering your eyes spend much more time all over the lines and down the page, rather of the little amount of time your eyes take jumping to another page, this annotation makes for a very liquid and effective way of reading. I think this is the best annotation I’ve ever seen of Shakespeare. The quality isn’t just present in form, however: the substitutions and explanations are always exact and almost never redundant (to the intermediate reader, not the intermediate professor =]).
The introduction by Burton Raffel and the concluding essay by the legendary Harold Bloom only add to the gains the book presents, and aid to comprehend the book from a wider perspective once your ideas and sensations reconcile with theirs.
All in all, a great product for anybody who loves Shakespeare, literature, or expanding their minds!
13 of 16 people found the following review helpful.
To thine own self be unfeigned …
By Themis-Athena
William Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” is arguably the most widely known and esteemed play ever written in the English language; it presents the world with questions and characters that have been the subject of thespian and scholarly debate ever since the Prince of Denmark’s initial aspect on the stage of London’s Globe Theatre. Probably written and initial performed in 1601 (estimates vary among 1600 and 1602), the play draws on Saxo Grammaticus’s late 12th/early 13th century chronicle “Gesta Danorum,” which includes a standard legend with a similar plot centering around a prince named Amleth; as well as various more contemporaneous sources, mainly Francois de Belleforest’s “Histoires Tragiques, Extraicts des Oeuvres Italiennes de Bandel” (1559-1580), which elaborates on the story told in the “Gesta Danorum,” and a lost play known as the “Ur-Hamlet” (i.e., initial “Hamlet”), now and again likewise attributed to Shakespeare, but evenly likely written by a dissimilar author a few decades earlier. Another work often times cited in this context is 16th century playwright Thomas Kyd’s “Spanish Tragedie.”
Pursuant to Shakespeare’s wishes and like all of his works, “Hamlet” was not without delay published, and the firstborn manuscript did not survive. However, in the absence of copyright laws or other forms of shelter of what today would be called the playwright’s intellectual property rights, basi bootleg copies (so-called quartos) based on transcripts made for the duration of or after performances begun to appear in 1603. Yet, it would not be until 1623 – seven years after Shakespeare’s 1616 death – that his former fellow actors John Hemmings and Henry Condell published 36 of his plays (including this one) in a collection known as the First Folio.
As no print version of any of Shakespeare’s plays has a bona fide assert to it is author’s first-hand blessings, ever since the Bard’s death the world is left with a good deal of questions with regards to his characters’ motivations and psychological makeup; introductory and foremost, in this queer case: who is this Prince of Denmark anyway, and what’s driving him – is he a reluctant suicide or reluctant avenger? A Renaissance man? Wrecked by Freudian guilt? Genuinely mad, or plainly putting on a clever act of deception? Or is he an individual else entirely? – Indeed, we’re even left in doubt as to what precisely it was that Shakespeare meant his characters to say, with all attendant interpretative consequences: Does the Prince wish for his “too too sullied” or his “too too solid” flesh to “melt, thaw, and resolve itself into a dew” in his original major soliloquy (Act I, Scene 2)? Does he in truth contemplate “the stamp of [that] one defect” which may fatally taint the sensing of a man’s other virtues, “be they as pure as grace,” before meeting his father’s ghost (I, 4)? Does Polonius, when sending Reynaldo on a spying mission after Laertes, refer to his system as “a fetch of wit” or “a fetch of warrant” (II, 1)? Do Hamlet’s musings in “To be, or not to be” (III, 1) concern “enterprises of great pith and moment” or “of great pitch and moment,” whose “currents turn awry and lose the name of action” by his doubts? Does or doesn’t the sight of the Norwegian army while Hamlet is on his way to England (IV, 4) prompt him, who has so far failed to carry out his purpose, to reflect “How all occasions do inform versus me,” and conclude his soliloquy with the vow “from this time forth my thoughts be bloody or be not one thing worth”?
How you answer any of these questions, and how you accordingly view the play’s characters, depends in no little percentage on the text you read. Like all Folger Shakespeare editions, this one is based on what the editors have deemed the “best early printed version,” while permitting the reader a distinctive direct comparison of the necessary authenti versions by including a text fundamentally combining these versions, with unobtrusive markers characterizing those passages appearing only in one peculiar version. For “Hamlet,” the editors eschewed the play’s very basi (1603) quarto, which was perchance compiled by a journeyman actor and whose inconsistencies with all subsequent versions (textually as well as plot-wise and even regarding reputation names) have caused it to be in general considered a “bad” quarto, in favor of the 1604 Second Quarto, which a great deal of even believe to be based on Shakespeare’s own basi draft of the play and which, in any event, while more broad than the 1623 First Folio (in turn, thought to be nearest to the version(s) genuinely developed on the Globe Theatre stage), boasts with regards to as secure a assert of authenticity as the latter. In numerous instances, the text follows the Second Quarto (Q2) without visually alerting the reader to the deviations vis-a-vis the First Folio (F1), thence compelling those more employed to the latter version to seek out the broad end notes to reassure themselves that (in the examples given above) it might in truth be “solid flesh,” “warrant,” and “pith and moment” (F1) rather of “sullied flesh,” “wit,” and “pitch and moment” (Q2). In other instances, however, the First Folio’s language (clearly marked as such) is given preference over that of the Second Quarto; while crucially, the text likewise includes all those passages *only* contained in the latter, including the “stamp of one defect” and “bloody thoughts” monologues, whose interpretation has such a direct bearing on numerous a reader’s understanding of Hamlet’s character.
The text is amplified by illustrations and annotations for those unfamiliar with 16th century English, scene-by-scene plot summaries, a short biography of Shakespeare, and introductory and concluding essays on this and the Bard’s other plays and on Shakespearean theatre, as well as broad suggestions for further reading, and a key to the play’s most widely known and esteemed lines. While it is improbable that after 400 years of debate any one version, be it in print, on stage or on screen, will be capable to generate unanimous acceptance as the “definitive” rendition of this complex play, this is an magnificent starting point for an in-depth excursion into the Prince of Denmark’s world.
Also recommended:
The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works 2nd Edition
BBC Shakespeare Tragedies DVD Giftbox
Olivier’s Shakespeare – Criterion Collection (Hamlet / Henry V / Richard III)
William Shakespeare’s Hamlet (Two-Disc Special Edition)
Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet
Hamlet
Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead
Peter Brook’s King Lear
Richard III
Julius Caesar
See all 206 client reviews…
|