Continuous Wave Technology American 1900 1932
From AM radio to color television, broadcasting raised enormous practical and policy difficultnesses in the United States, exceptionally in relation to the federal government’s role in licensing and regulation. How did technical change, corporate interest, and political pressures fetch regarding the world that station owners work within today (and that tuned-in buyers make profitable)? In Radio and Television Regulation, Hugh R. Slotten examines the selections that confronted federal agencies — original the Department of Commerce, then the Federal Radio Commission in 1927, and seven years later the Federal Communications Commission — and shows the affect of their conclusions on manufacturing technologies. Slotten analyzes the policy argues that emerged when the public significations of AM and FM radio and black-and-white and color television primary became apparent. His discussion of the early years of radio examines powerful personalities — including navy secretary Josephus Daniels and commerce secretary Herbert Hoover — who maneuvered for government control of “the wireless.” He then considers fierce contest amongst companies such as Westinghouse, GE, and RCA, which speedily grasped the mercantile promise of radio and later of television and was struggling for technical edge and market advantage. Analyzing the complex interplay of the components forming public policy for radio and television broadcasting, and taking into account the ideological traditions that framed these controversies, Slotten sheds light on the rise of the regulatory state. In an epilogue he discusses his determinations in terms of contemporary argues over high-resolution TV.
Review [ Radio and Television Regulation] is a solidly grounded scholarship of the most eminent quality. (Jeremy Harris Lipschultz Journal of Radio Studies )
Slotten’s study is a valuable addition to the historical creative writing of recognized artisti value on broadcasting (or more broadly the regulation of engineering in society). It is both well researched and well written. (Christopher H. Sterling Journal of American History )
Another soild contribution to the creative writing of recognized artisti value on the development of U.S. broadcasting. Slotten’s exploration into the complex routine of broadcast regulation is meticulous. (Jason Loviglio Enterprise and Society )
The depiction of the manifold tensions that subsist amid technocratic and nontechnocratic views concerning the function of public policy foundations infuse the book’s narrative with a freshness and originality that make it a welcome and valuable addition to what has been an other than as supposed or expected lackluster list of titles quintessentially more aim on describing the rules and regulatings that govern broadcast media than in examining their revealing and illuminating origins. (Michael C. Keith Historian )
Analyzing the complex interplay of of the constituents forming public policy for radio and television broadcasting, and taking into account the ideological traditions that framed these controversies, the author sheds light on the rise of the regulatory state. (International Review of Administrative Sciences )
Not since the writings of Marshall McLuhan have cognition shapers in the broadcast field shown interest in technical determinism… Finally Hugh R. Slotten redeems a technical perspective. (Craig Allen American Historical Review )
A stringent and thoughtful study of American broadcast regulation is always a priceless contribution. Hugh Slotten’s new book succeeds admirably in this regard. (James Schwoch Business History Review )
Slotten’s work usefully augments the body of creative writing of recognized artisti value concerned with telecommunications and mass media law, policy, and regulation. (William J. White Technology and Culture )
Slotten efficaciously uses published primary roots and unpublished archives to talk about the complex interactions among engineers and policy-makers in the United States. The scope of the book is splendid and covers conclusions over a forty-year amount of time involving four major technologies (AM radio, monochrome television, FM radio, and color television) that specified the broadcast industry until the passage of the Telecommunications Act in 1996. (Ronald KlineCornell University, author of Consumers in the Country and Steinmetz: Engineer and Socialist )
About the Author Hugh R. Slotten is a postdoctoral fellow in the History of Science Department at Harvard University. He is the author of Patronage, Practice, and the Culture of American Science.
Continuous Wave Technology American 1900 1932 Photo
Continuous Wave Technology American 1900 1932 Photo
Continuous Wave Technology American 1900 1932 Image
Continuous Wave Technology American 1900 1932 Picture
Most helpful client reviews
2 of 2 persons found the following review helpful.
Concise study of the government and technology By A Hugh Slotten, a postdoctoral fellow in History at Harvard, has explored the public argues surrounding the adoption of assorted broadcasting technologies, including AM and FM radio and black-and-white and color television in the U.S. Federal agencies most concerned with their regulation, beginning with the Federal Radio Commission in 1927 and continuing to the Federal Communications Commission of the 1930s to the 1960s. Slotten’s book explores the complex relationships among government and industry, the importance of key persons in the government, and the influence of political ideologies as they related to policy formation at the dawn of broadcasting. Along the way, he reveals much regarding the creation of the “regulatory state” that that specified the communications industries in the 20th century. The book’s chapters are ordered chronologically and treat key sequences in the history of broadcast regulation. Chapter one treats the formative years of the radio industry and the creation of the basi federal regulatory agencies, focusing on the role of engineer and future president Herbert Hoover in the process. He then moves on to show how regulation contributed to the stunning mercantile success of broadcasting and radio networks, in spite of the Great Depression. Some readers may be amazed to learn that television was being touted as the “next big thing” even in the 1920s, and Slotten analyzes the way TV regulatory policy emerged well before the engineering science itself was ready for deployment. The maturation of both the broadcasting industry and the government’s regulatory and standards-setting mechanisms is elaborate in a chapter on the introduction of FM broadcasting, along with an in-depth analysis of the role of technical noesis and expertness in the policy process. By the time television re-emerged after being delayed by the Depression and World War II, the FCC had grown conscious that the technical expertness necessitated to make informed regulatory conclusions often relied on uncertain, not complete or highly biased knowledge. This, and the fact that the agency was now less likely than ever to make conclusions that would threaten entrenched mercantile interests, led them to delay the introduction of UHF television, limiting it is success as a challenger to VHF (channels 2-13). By regarding 1950, the FCC had hired it is own technical expertise, and was less likely to rely on the views of (presumably biased) industry personnel. This was a key element in the decision to reverse an early ruling that promoted the color TV system invented at CBS, which employed a large, rotating disk fitted with optical filters to formulate the illusion of color. The FCC now pushed for a color popular that was more in keeping with it is new face; a usual that protected entrenched interests in the black-and-white TV field (the new color usual was backward-compatible with black-and-white) while furthering what was seen as the next logical step in TV technology. The resulting color standard, while criticized today as obsolete, nevertheless stood the test of time for half a century. Slotten’s work is a well-researched yet brief survey of a complex subject, and it ought to be closely read by those mesmerized in the ways that federal agencies simultaneously nurture and sovereignty in new communications technologies.
See all 1 client reviews…
|