Home > american-radio > American Radio Reporters Correspondents Abu Jamal
22 May

American Radio Reporters Correspondents Abu Jamal

Posted by Comments off

The FBI’s current spy and infiltration program “sounds like a COINTELPRO to me,” said a spry 76-year-old civil rights motion veteran.

Robert Keglar of Charleston, Mississippi was referring to an earlier FBI mystery program — COunter INTELligence PROgrams or COINTELPROs — that not only promoted spying on and infiltration of civil rights groups but many times harassed activists and pitted them versus each other, beginning as early as 1956.

“Of course, we had the state of Mississippi spying on us, too. And even private citizens doing it. No one will have to ever forget the Mississippi Sovereignty Commission or the White Citizens Councils,” Keglar said.

The former teacher and boy scout leader’s mother and her friend were tortured and murdered in 1966 for registering voters in Tallahatchie County; his brother was killed when he tried to learn what happened to his mother.

COINTELPRO programs often times made mayhem of perfectly rightful activenesses led by the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee or SNCC and other civil rights groups including the NAACP, the institution that both Birdia Keglar and Adlena Hamlett belonged to.

As the Mississippi Sovereignty Commission, financed by the state’s legislature one year after the 1955 murder of fourteen year-old Emmett Till, was initiated to assure integration would not occur, former FBI and military intelligence agents were hired to spy on Mississippians as the Commission came into power.

On the federal side of the surveillance coin, COINTELPROs were initiated by the FBI in the same year.

Private White Citizens Councils, formed one year earlier in 1955, were likewise a product of Mississippi’s fight to maintain segregation and represented the private voice of the state’s leading segregationists.

Councils members included prominent bankers, attorneys, physicians, elected officials, chambers of commerce members, realtors and others.

Byron de La Beckwith, convicted for the murder of civil rights icon Medgar Evers, was a Citizens Councils member.

John Satterfield of Yazoo City, a Methodist leader and president of the Mississippi State Bar Association and the American Bar Association (for two terms), was a member, too.

Sovereignty Commission reports, firstborn publicly freed in 1997, are available online through the state’s division of archives and include files on a great deal of Citizens Councils actions as well.

But COINTELPRO files – if they were ever included in Sovereignty Commission’s records – are to an outstanding degree invisible. Some Mississippians contend that thousands of Commission files were purged before they were turned over to the ACLU and made public. And that the FBI, Sovereignty Commission and White Citizens Councils worked hand in hand.

“I’ve always wondered how the data was passed on that pinpointed incisively where my mother and her friend would be at that specific time. Who was spying on them? Who told the Klan where they were going? Who knew what route they were taking?” Keglar asks.

The county’s district attorney informed Birdia Keglar’s son of the “car accident.” But relatives and friends, as well as assorted “eye-witnesses,” reported that she and Hamlett were run off the road, pulled from their car, tortured and murdered by highway patrolmen who were also Klan members. The June 12, 1966 accident was never investigated; Mississippi public officials and the FBI say no reports of the accident exist.

COINTELPRO Discovered in Pennsylvania Break-In

The existence of COINTELPRO came to light back in March of 1971, when a group calling themselves the “Citizens’ Committee to Investigate the FBI” broke into an FBI field office — ironically in Pennsylvania, the same state where current FBI spying charges were lodged this past week – and then provided the press and respective members of Congress with mystery documents seized from that office, showing the government’s involvement in criminalizing dissent.

While FBI and police harassment were suspected by way of surveillance and infiltration for the duration of the 1960s, any talk of mystery or dangerous CIA-type action versus domestic dissidents would have been dismissed as paranoid had it not been for the proof picked up in this raid, according to Brian Glick, the author of “War at Home: Covert action versus U. S. activists and what we may do in regards to it.”

Glick, a New York attorney and social justice advocate, is globally known for his observations and writing on COINTELPRO operations.

In fact, covert operations have been employed versus those who speak out versus the government all around the FBI’s history (and even in both the Revolutionary and Civil Wars), including recent FBI monitoring of environmental and animal rights organizations, close watch of anti-war groups by a mystery Pentagon program and eavesdropping on domestic communications by the National Security Agency.

The formal COINTELPROs of 1956-1971 were broadly purposed versus organizations that were at the time considered politically radical, as well, such as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s Southern Christian Leadership Conference.

Within a year of the 1971 Pennsylvania break-in, former FBI chief J. Edgar Hoover declared the centralized COINTELPRO over, and all future counterintelligence operations to be handled on a “case-by-case basis,” an official FBI statement that sounds all too intimate following the more recent spy/infiltration discovery.

Back in 1971, Hoover did not promise that the FBI would stop using COINTELPRO tactics, and more mystery documents were revealed through lawsuits filed versus the FBI by NBC correspondent Carl Stern and then in 1976 by the “Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities of the United States Senate,” ordinarily referred to as the “Church Committee” for it is chairman, Senator Frank Church of Idaho.

Millions of pages of COINTELPRO documents stay unreleased, while a lot of freed documents were closely totally censored; just as lately freed reports on the FBI’s infiltration of the Pennsylvania Peace group, a good deal of COINTELPRO documents made available to the public include lines completely blacked out, making them unreadable.

Also in 1971, the Church Committee concluded that “covert action programs have been used to disrupt the lawful political activenesses of person Americans and groups and to discredit them, using dangerous and degrading tactics which are abhorrent in a free and decent society,” writes political scientist Howard Zinn.

Where Did COINTELPRO Come From?

COINTELPRO developed out of the anti-Communist hysteria of the Cold War years, leading FBI agents into taking actions versus groups that had not one thing to do with Communism. The Bureau would take actions versus humans and organizations merely because they were critical of government policy, Zinn writes.

The political scientist found numerous examples of free speech violations in which the FBI purposed humans because they opposed U. S. alien policy or criticized police actions.

Documents collected by the Church Committee “compel the conclusion that Federal law enforcement officers looked upon themselves as guardians of the status quo.” Zinn cites the surveillance and harassment of Martin Luther King Jr. as an crucial example.

But SNCC, with it is proactive philosophy, topped the list of aimed programs underneath “Negro radicals.”

And when congressional investigations, political trials, and other traditionalisti legal modes of repression failed to counter the growing movements, and even helped to fuel them, the FBI and police moved outside the law, resorting to the mystery and systematic use of fraud and strength to sabotage constitutionally protected political activity.

“Their methods ranged far beyond surveillance, amounting to a home front version of the covert action for which the CIA has become notorious all around the world.”

FBI Headquarters secretly instructed it is field offices to propose schemes to “expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or other than as supposed or expected neutralize” specific humans and groups.

Close coordination with local police and prosecutors was strongly encouraged. Other commended collaborators included friendly news media, business and foundation executives, and university, church, and trade union officials, as well as such “patriotic” organizations as the American Legion.

In his research, Glick uncovered a total of 2,370 officially approved COINTELPRO activenesses that were admitted to the Senate Intelligence Committee, and thousands more have since been uncovered.

Glick lists four main methods employed by the agents:

1) infiltration by agents and informers with the intent to discredit and disrupt; 2) psychological warfare from the outside, using “dirty tricks” to undermine progressive movements; 3) harassment through the legal system, making targets appear to be criminal; and 4) extralegal strength and violence including break-ins, vandalism, assaults, and beatings to frighten dissidents and disrupt their movements.

The lengthy list of activists coming underneath attack included Cesar Chavez, Fathers Daniel and Phillip Berrigan, Rev. Jesse Jackson, David Dellinger, officials of the American Friends Service Committee and the National Council of Churches, and other leading pacifists were high on the list, “as were projects directly protected by the First Amendment, such as anti-war teach-ins, progressive bookstores, independent filmmakers, and substitute newsprints and news services.”

It was COINTELPRO “that enabled the FBI and police to eliminate the leaders of mass movements in the 1960s without undermining the effigy of the United States as a democracy, finish with free speech and the rule of law.

“Charismatic orators and dynamic organizers were covertly attacked and ‘neutralized’ before their attainments could be transposed to others and stable structures traditionalisti to carry on their work.”

FBI documents were found disclosing six major official counterintelligence programs, of which three focalized on the Civil Rights Movement with top priority given to the “COINTELPRO – Communist Party-USA, with it is specific operations conducted on Dr. King, the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party, the NAACP, the National Lawyers Guild.

Also the National Committee to Abolish the House Un-American Activities Committee, Women’s Strike for Peace, the American Friends Service Committee, and the National Committee for a SANE Nuclear Policy.

Officially, the six major COINTELPRO programs (with hundreds of discerned operations) were COINTELPRO – Communist Party, USA (CP); COINTELPRO – Social Workers Party (SWP); COINTELPRO – Puerto Rican Independence Movement; COINTELPRO – Black Liberation Movement; COINTELPRO – New Left; COINTELPRO – AIM; and COINTELPRO – White.

Dr. King was a target of an elaborate COINTELPRO plot to drive him to suicide and replace him “in his role of the leadership of the Negro people” with conservative Black lawyer Samuel Pierce (later named to President Ronald Reagan’s cabinet) according to revisionist historians including Glick and Zinn, who have come to view King’s assassination, as well as Malcolm X’s, as domestic covert operations.

Glick cites a letter (Michael Gabriel, “James Earl Ray: The Last Days of Inmate #65477,” Cat Yoga Publishing, April, 2004) written by James Earl Ray, in which Ray claimed there was never a trial in the homicide case.

“The government gained control of the attorney representing me, Percy Foreman. Without going into a lot of details, Mr. Foreman maneuvered me into a plea of guilty after he had me sign some literary contracts, and then signing all of the proceeds over to him under the guise he would use the cash to finance a trial in the MLK case.

“Foreman received the plea thru respective threats: If I didn’t enter the plea, the government would probably undertake my brother Jerry, for conspiring in the MLK shooting, that my father might be returned to an Iowa prison from where he had escaped in 1926, and that he (Foreman), might not put forth his best attempts in a trial.”

A label of “Black Nationalist Hate Groups,” was the vehicle for the Bureau’s all-out assault on Dr. King, SNCC, CORE, the Black Panther Party, the Nation of Islam, “Black Muslims,” and the National Welfare Rights Organization.

The Socialist Workers Party and groups supporting or working with Malcolm X and the National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam were likewise identified as targets.

Still others organizations were harassed:

The League of Black Revolutionary Workers, the Dodge Revolutionary Union Movement (DRUM), the Revolutionary Action Movement (RAM), the Republic of New Afrika (RNA), the Congress of African People, Black student unions, “and a great deal of local Black churches and community organizations engaged in a struggle for decent living conditions, justice, equality, and empowerment.”

Additional COINTELPRO operations concentered on the destruction of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), the Peace and Freedom Party, the Institute for Policy Studies, and a wide range of anti-war, anti-racist, student, GI, veteran, feminist, lesbian, gay, environmental, Marxist, and anarchist groups.

Also the network of feed co-ops, health clinics, child care centers, schools, bookstores, newspapers, community centers, street theaters, rock groups, and communes that formed the infrastructure of the counter-culture, according to Glick.

One example of COINTELPRO-Communist Party-USA harassment involved 18 staffers and supporters of Kudzu, a pro-left, counter-culture newspaper devised in Jackson, Mississippi.

On October 8, 1968, they were attacked and beaten by Jackson deputy sheriffs. Newspaper staffers had already pulled through a conviction on obscenity charges, the arrest of salespeople, the confiscation of cameras, and even dispossession from it is offices.

Kudzu was put under direct surveillance by the FBI in 1970. For more than two months FBI agents made every day searches without warrants, according to the coordinator of PEN American Center’s Freedom to Write Committee:

On October 24 and 25, Kudzu sponsored a Southern territorial group discussion of the Underground Press Syndicate. The night before the group discussion the FBI and Jackson detectives searched the Kudzu offices twice. During the search, an FBI agent threatened to kill Kudzu staffers.

On the morning of October 26, FBI agents again searched the office. That evening local police entered the building, kept it is eight occupants at gunpoint, produced a bag of marijuana, and then arrested them…. A Kudzu staff fellow member commented,

“The FBI used to be reasonably sophisticated, but not so long ago they have broken one of our doors, pointed guns in our faces, told us that ‘punks like you don’t have any rights,’ and threatened to shoot us on the street if they see us with our hands in our pockets.”

Discovered among these particular units was a distinctive COINTELPRO program focusing on “White Hate Groups,” at least on paper.

But Glick and assorted other researchers argue that COINTELPRO-white appeared only to go after violent right-wing groups, and that the FBI in truth gave covert support to the Ku Klux Klan, Minutemen, Nazis, and other racist vigilantes, beneath the cover of being even-handed.

Specifically, COINTELPRO documents indicate that numerous infiltrators discreetly spied for years without calling attention to themselves (like the Soviet moles or sleepers) while others acted as instigators to disrupt meetings and conventions or social and other contacts.

University of Delaware historian Gary May tells the story of slain activist Viola Liuzzo in “The Informant: The FBI, the Ku Klux Klan, and the Murder of Viola Liuzzo,” (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, May 11, 2005) who was murdered in 1965 at the hands of the Ku Klux Klan without delay after the Selma, Ala., voting rights march took place.

President Johnson held close tabs on the investigation and when suspects were taken into custody almost immediately, it seemed the FBI was doing it is occupation with extra diligence; federal informant Gary Thomas Rowe had infiltrated the Alabama Klan five years earlier and speedily pointed out the suspects.

But Rowe’s own role in the murder was suspicious, and it turned out that his experiences with the KKK often times linked him with other notorious race crimes of the era, including the Birmingham church bombing. As with a good deal of other FBI informants, this one played both sides.

Agents disseminate rumors, made accusations, inflamed disagreements, and caused splits. “They spurred and encouraged divisive proposals, sabotaged activities, overspent scarce resources, stole funds, seduced leaders, exacerbated rivalries, caused jealousy and public embarrassment to groups. They often times led activists into unnecessary risk and set them up for prosecution.”

One mutual maneuver, known as placing a “snitch jacket” or “bad jacket” on an activist, damaged the victim’s effectiveness and generated “confusion, distrust, and paranoia.” The maneuver was employed to divert time and energy and turn co-workers versus one another, even provoking violence.

“Jacketing” was often done by “carefully orchestrated series of news releases and newspaper articles prepared by the FBI and ‘cooperative’ reporters.”

An activist could be falsely labeled an informer in “FBI-composed anonymous letters” or in other operations, where the FBI arranged for police to release one fellow member of a group that had been arrested together or to single one out for special treatment, “and then disseminate the rumor that the beneficiary had cooperated.”

A snitch jacket was applied in 1968 versus SNCC leader Stokely Carmichael (Kwame Toure) along with a “whispering campaign,” to “tag Carmichael with a CIA label,” Glick wrote, citing a letter from the FBI Director to Washington Field Office, July 1, 1968 and memorandums from Washington Field Office to FBI Director, July 9, and July 10, 1968.

Comedian Dick Gregory, who expended time within Mississippi marching for voting rights and outside of the state raising cash to support feed and clothe starving children in the Delta, was also the target of “covert maneuvers” to get the Mafia to move versus Black activists … and the entire leadership of the Communist Party – USA.

Meanwhile, the FBI’s “main right-wing beneficiary” was the Ku Klux Klan, Glick and others say. In 1961, the Klan brutalized freedom riders as they arrived in respective Southern cities, including Jackson, with “advance info supplied by the FBI.”

The Mississippi Sovereignty Commission diligently collected and held this advance information. The names of civil rights advocates, their finish address, age, and name of employer or school attended were often accumulated and kept in Sovereignty Files, some under the category name, “Freedom Riders Groups and Addresses, Group Numbers and Date Arrived.”

The FBI kept talking with Klan members. By 1965, a great deal of 20 percent of Klan members were on the FBI payroll, galore occupying leadership positions in seven of the fourteen Klan groups all over the country, states political scientist Robert Goldstein in “Political Repression in Modern America: 1870 to the Present,” (Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Co., 1978).

Finally, Sovereignty Commission staffers oftentimes shared files with FBI special agents running the COINTELPROs, as evidenced by Commission files kept on targets including the Freedom Democratic Party and the Republic of New Afrika (RNA).

One Mississippi Delta SNCC volunteer says she was “exposed” no sooner than she arrived on the occupation in Holly Springs. An August 18, 1966 story in the Jackson Daily News held that SNCC volunteer Jo Freeman was a “professional agitator” citing “the Burns report” as it is major source of information.

Five photographs accompanied the story, including one taken on December 3, 1964 of Freeman speaking from the second floor balcony of the administration building on the University of California, Berkeley campus.

When Freeman’s Mississippi SNCC boss saw the editorial, he put Freeman on a bus back to Atlanta. “That thing makes you Klan bait,” he told her.

Freeman assumed the FBI was behind her experience in the Delta, even even though she did not recognise when it comes to COINTELPRO at the time.

“It had all the earmarks of an FBI plant, calling for connections among California and Mississippi. My faith was reinforced when the FBI’s COINTELPRO activenesses versus the Civil Rights Movement in general and it is persecution of Dr. Martin Luther King in queer were revealed.

“Not until 1997 did I discover that the actual source of the editorial and photos was the Mississippi Sovereignty Commission (MSC), an official state agency of which I was completely incognizant in 1966.

“And only after reading a great deal of pages in the MSC files at the Mississippi Department of Archives and History did I realize that I and others like me were not just foot soldiers in the Civil Rights Movement, but cannon fodder in the Cold War,” wrote Freeman in her autobiography, “At Berkeley in the Sixties: Education of an Activist, 1961-1965,” (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004).

Glick and others maintain that in a literal sense thousands of important files proceed to be withheld, while others have been destroyed. Further, former COINTELPRO operatives report “the most heinous and embarrassing actions” were never consecrated to writing; the statement of retired FBI Special Agent Arthur Murtagh who appeared before the Select Committee on Intelligence, and who was interviewed by retired FBI Special Agent Wes Swearingen in June 1979, serves as just one example.

Officials with wide personal psychological result of perception learning and reasoning of COINTELPRO have been silenced, “most notably William C. Sullivan, who produced the [COINTELPRO] program and ran it allround the 1960s. Sullivan was killed in uninvestigated 1977 ‘hunting accident’ shortly after giving extensive selective information to a grand jury investigating the FBI, but before he could testify publicly,” Glick states.

* * *

And so …

As internal agency documents freed in March raised new questions over federal spying without court authorization – in this case on anti-war Americans – since Sept. 11, 2001, William Crowley, a spokesman for the FBI’s Pittsburgh office, “insisted the monitoring was legal and related to an ongoing investigation but gave no details of the probe.”

Crowley further stated that when the FBI found no link among it is investigation and the center, it ended the surveillance, Jonathan S. Landay of Knight Ridder News Service reported.

The ACLU, meanwhile, contends the documents are the primary to “show conclusively” that an anti-war group was purposed for anti-war views. ACLU staff attorney, Marty Catherine Roper, told Landay.

“The documents demonstrate that “Americans are not safe from mystery government surveillance, even when they are handing out fliers in the town square, an action without doubt or question protected by the Constitution.”

The Thomas Merton Center, named for an American Roman Catholic monk, poetical and author who passed away in 1968, in the meantime describes itself as a group of people from diverse faiths who believe in “nonviolent struggle” for peace and justice.

Yet an FBI report dated Nov. 29, 2002, specified the center as “a left-wing institution advocating, amid galore political causes, pacifism.”‘

The report likewise noted that the center had cooperated with an Islamic institution in staging an event to advertize understanding amongst Muslims and non-Muslims in Pittsburgh.

“The documents say they were conducting a good deal of kind of investigation,” Thomas Merton Center conductor Jim Kleissler told Landay.

“That implies we were beneath surveillance plainly because we were versus the war. Our freedoms are being undermined.”

No surprise there.

American Radio Reporters Correspondents Abu Jamal

The all-new Kindle has a new electronic-ink screen with 50 percent better contrast than any other e-reader, a new sleek design with a 21 percent littler body while still keeping the same 6-inch-size reading area, and a 17 percent lighter weight at just 8.5 ounces. The new Kindle likewise offers 20 percent more quickly page turns, up to one month of battery life, double the storage to 3,500 books, built-in Wi-Fi, a graphite color option and more—all for only $139.

American Radio Reporters Correspondents Abu Jamal

American Radio Reporters Correspondents Abu Jamal Photo

American Radio Reporters Correspondents Abu Jamal

American Radio Reporters Correspondents Abu Jamal Image

American Radio Reporters Correspondents Abu Jamal

American Radio Reporters Correspondents Abu Jamal Image

American Radio Reporters Correspondents Abu Jamal

American Radio Reporters Correspondents Abu Jamal Photo


Most helpful client reviews

26122 of 26372 people found the following review helpful.
5Kindle vs. Nook (updated 1/2/2011)
By Ron Cronovich
If you’re attempting to choose among a Nook and a Kindle, perhaps I may help. My wife and I have owned a Nook (the original one, not the new Nook Color), a Kindle 2, and a Kindle DX. When Amazon declared the Kindle 3 this summer, we pre-ordered two Kindle 3′s: the wi-fi only model in graphite, and the wi-fi + 3G model in white. They arrived in late August and we have applied them very regularly since then. For us, Kindle is better than Nook, but Nook is a good device with it is own vantages that I will talk about below. I’ll end this review with a few words in regards to the Nook Color.

First, reasons why we prefer the Kindle:

* Speed

In our experience, the Kindle is very zippy equated to the Nook. Page refresh speed (the time it takes a new page to appear after you push the page-turn button) was WAY more immediate on Kindle 2 than on Nook, and it’s quicker yet on Kindle 3. Yet, I read a whole book on the Nook and didn’t find the slower page refresh to be annoying – you get applied to it, and it’s not a problem.

For me, the more essential speed divergence worries navigation – moving the cursor around the screen, for example to pick a book from your library, or to jump to a chapter by selecting it in the table of contents. On Kindle, you do this by pushing a 5-way rocker button, and the cursor moves very quickly. On Nook, you do this by activating the color LCD touchscreen (which normally shuts off when not in use, to conserve battery). A “virtual rocker button” appears on the screen, and you touch it to move the cursor. Unfortunately, the Nook cursor moves very sluggishly. This might not be a big deal to you, but it actually got annoying to me, peculiarly since my wife’s Kindle was so quick and responsive.

In November 2010, Nook got a software upgrade that increments page refresh speed and makes navigation more responsive. I returned my Nook months ago, so I can not tell you if the Nook’s performance is now equivalent to the Kindle’s, but Nook owners in the remarks section have convinced me that the software update improves the experience of using the Nook. If performance is a big element in your decision, visit a Best Buy and compare Kindle and Nook side by side.

* Screen contrast

You’ve seen Amazon’s claims that the Kindle 3 e-ink has 50% better contrast than Kindle 2 or other e-ink devices. I have no way of precisely measuring the betterment in contrast, but I may tell you that the Kindle 3 display unquestionably has more contrast than Kindle 2 or Nook. The divergence is noticeable, and important: more screen contrast means less eyestrain when reading in poorly lit rooms.

In well-lit rooms, the Nook and Kindle 2 have sufficient contrast to concede for comfortable reading. But I oftentimes read in low-light conditions, like in bed at night, or in a poorly lit room. In these situations, reading on Nook or Kindle 2 was a bit uncomfortable and oftentimes gave me a mild headache. When I got the Kindle 3, the extra contrast was without delay noticeable, and made it more comfortable to read beneath less-than-ideal lighting conditions. (If you go with a Nook, just make sure you have a good reading lamp nearby.)

* Battery life

The Nook’s color LCD touch screen drains it is battery speedily – I could never get more than 5 days out of a charge. The Kindle 2 had longer battery life than the Nook, and Kindle 3 has even longer life: in the 3 months since we received our Kindle 3′s, we specifically get 3 weeks of battery life among charges. (We keep wireless off with regards to half the time to save battery power.)

* Weight

Nook weighs in regards to 3 ounces more than the new Kindle, and you may genuinely feel the difference. Without a case, Nook is still light sufficient to hold in one hand for long reading sessions without fatigue. But in a case, Nook is a heavy sucker. The new Kindle 3 is so light, even in a case, we find it comfortable keeping in one hand for long reading sessions.

Reasons a lot of persons might prefer the Nook:

* In-store experience

If you need aid with your nook, you may take it to any barnes and noble and get a real humane to help. You may take your nook into the coffee shop division of your local B&N store and read any book for free for up to one hour per day. When you take your nook to B&N, numerous in-store particular deals and the occasional free book pop up on your screen.

* User-replaceable battery

Rechargeable batteries ultimately lose their capacity to hold a charge. Nook’s battery is user-replaceable and comparatively inexpensive. To replace Kindle’s battery, Amazon wants you to ship your Kindle to Amazon, and they will ship you back a DIFFERENT Kindle than the one you sent (it’s the same model, for example if you send a white Kindle 3, you get a white Kindle 3 back, but you get a “refurbished” one, NOT the precise one you sent them). I don’t like this at all.

However, various humans have posted remarks here that have eased my concerns. Someone looked up stats on the Kindle’s battery and did galore simple calculations to show that it ought to last for 3 or more years. Before that happens, I will surely have upgraded to a newer Kindle model by then. Also, someone found a lot of companies that trade Kindle batteries at reasonable cost and have how-to videos that demonstrate how we may replace the battery ourselves. Doing this would void the Kindle’s warranty, but the battery will probably not fail until long after the warranty expires.

* ePub

Nook uses the ePub format, a widely used open format. Amazon uses a proprietary ebook format. Many libraries will “lend” ebooks in the ePub format, which works with nook but not kindle. However, a free and reputable program called Calibre allows you to translate ebooks from one format to another – it supports a great deal of formats, including ePub and Kindle. The only catch is that it doesn’t work with copy-protected ebooks, so you can’t, for example, buy a Kindle book (which is copy protected) and translate it to ePub so you may read it on a Nook.

* Nook’s color LCD touchscreen

The primary Nook has a little color LCD screen on the bottom for navigation. This could be a pro or con, depending on your preferences. It makes the Nook hipper and less drab than Kindle. Some humans take delight in using the color LCD to view their library or navigate. I did, at first. But after two weeks of use, and comparings with my wife’s Kindle, I found the consecrated buttons of the Kindle posing no difficulty and far quicker to use than the Nook’s color touchscreen. I also found the bright light from the color screen distracting when I was attempting to read a book or newspaper (though when not in use, it shuts off after a minute or so to conserve battery).

* expandable capacity

Nook comes with 2GB of internal memory. If you need more capacity, you may insert a microSD card to add up to 16GB more memory. Kindle comes with 4GB of internal memory – twice as much as Nook – but there’s no way to exaggerate that. Kindle doesn’t receive memory cards of any type. If you primarily use your device to read ebooks and newspapers, this shouldn’t be an issue. I have over 100 books on my Kindle, and I’ve applied only a tiny fraction of the memory. Once Kindle’s memory fills up, just delete books you don’t need prompt access to; you may always restore them later, in seconds, for free.

A few other notes:

Kindle and Nook have other features, such as an MP3 player and a web browser, but I caution you to have low expected values for these features. The MP3 player on the Kindle is like the first-generation iPod shuffle – you can’t see what song is playing, and you can’t navigate to other songs on your device. I don’t like the browser on either device; e-ink is just not a good engineering science for surfing the web; it’s slower and clunkier than LCD screen technology, so even the browser on an Android phone or iPod touch is more gratifying to use. However, a good deal of commenters have more favorable views of either device’s browser, and you might, too.

* ebook lending

If you have a Nook or a Kindle, you may “lend” an ebook you purchased to somebody else with the same device for up to two weeks. The Nook has always had this feature. The Kindle just got this feature as of December 2010. Most but not all purchased ebooks are lendable, due to publisher restrictions.

* PDF help

Kindle and Nook both handle PDF files, but in dissimilar ways. When you put a PDF file on your nook, nook converts it into an ebook-like file, then you may adjust the font size, and the text and pagination will adjust just like with any ebook. But you can not see the initial PDF file in the native format in which it was created. Kindle 3 and Kindle DX have native help for PDF files. You may see PDF files just as they would appear on your computer. You may also convert PDF files to an ebook-like format, and then Kindle handles them just the way the Nook handles them – text and pagination adjust when you alter the font size. Unfortunately, numerous symbols, equations, and graphics get lost or mangled in the translation – even when watching PDF files in their native format on the Kindle. Moreover, the little screen size of the Kindle 3 and the Nook is not great for PDF files, most of which are designed for a larger page size. You may zoom and pan, but this is cumbersome and tiresome. Thanks to commenters who suggested looking at PDF files in landscape mode on the Kindle (I don’t know if you may do this on Nook); this way, you may see the entire top half of the page without panning, and then scroll down to the bottom half. This works a little better.

SUMMARY:

Nook and Kindle each offer their own advantages. We like the nook’s user-replaceable battery, compatibility with ePub format, and in-store experience. But we strongly prefer Kindle 3 because it is performance is zippier, it is higher-contrast screen is requiring little effort to read, and it’s littler and lighter so it is more portable and more comfortable to hold in one hand for long reading sessions.

* Nook Color

Everything I wrote with regards to the Nook in this review applies to the primary Nook (which proceeds to be available), not the new Nook Color. To me, the Nook Color is in a dissimilar product category than the Kindle or initial Nook. Nook Color has an LCD screen, like an iPad or most computer monitors. That’s a huge disfavor for people like me, who get headaches from reading a computer screen for long periods of time. Amazon’s Kindle product page has an informative division on e-ink vs. LCD displays.

But a heap of humans don’t have difficultnesses reading from computer screens, and the Nook Color is getting glowing reviews in the press and by owners. For the money, it offers a lot of functionality such as a good web browser and the capacity to play games and watch movies. But keep in mind: it costs a lot more than the Kindle, it weighs closely twice as much, it doesn’t come in a 3G version, and (unlike the basi Nook) the Nook Color doesn’t have a user replaceable battery.

8233 of 8409 people found the following review helpful.
3Worth the money. Not perfect, but very very good for start out to finish novels in good light
By Jeffrey Stanley
The Kindle is my original e-ink reader. I own an iPad, an iPhone, and have owned a Windows-based phone in the past that I used as an ereader.

My overall impression of the device is good.

The good:
I’d frankly rather read linear (read from page one to the end, one page at a time) fiction from it than a book, because I can’t always get comfortable with a book. Hardcovers are now and then a bit heavy, and paperbacks don’t always lie open easily. The Kindle is fantastically light and thin. I may hold it in one hand easily. The page turn buttons are conveniently located. Page-turns aren’t instant, but they’re probably more immediate than turning a physical page in a printed book (there are just a lot more page-turns unless you choose a little font). The contrast is better than other ereaders I’ve seen. There is zero eye strain in good light. My eyesight isn’t the biggest and I like being capable to increase the font size and read without glasses. I love being capable to browse the Kindle store and read samples before resolving to purchase. The “experimental” browser is breathtakingly usable, but isn’t great. It is utile for browsing wikipedia and blogs. The biggest drawback to the browser is the awkward pointer navigation, using the 5-way pad. It syncs your furthest read page over the internet so you may pick up where you left off using your iPhone or iPad.

The so-so:
The kindle store could use more categories and sorting options. You can’t sort by “top rated,” and there is no category for “alternate histories,” for example. Finding a very-specific type of fiction relies on keyword searches, which don’t do a great job. The wifi occasionally doesn’t connect before it times-out. You seldom need the wifi, but it is annoying if you modify a setting, answer “OK” to the prompt to connect, and the thing tells you it failed to connect two seconds later (the precise moment it gives evidence of that it did in the end connect, then you need to go back to update the setting again). Most settings don’t require a connection, but it is a minor annoyance. Most of your time will be expended reading, and of course your books are stored on the device and a connection is not required. Part of me wishes I’d purchased the 3G model, because the browser is good sufficient that having lifetime free 3G wireless would be worth the extra money. Magazines don’t look very good and are not very easy to navigate. There is minor glare in galore lighting conditions, for the most part when a lamp is positioned behind the reader’s head.

The bad:
The contrast is reasonable to poor in dim light. It is much requiring little effort to read a printed page in dim light. In good light, contrast is on par with a pulp paperback. In dim light it feels closely like reading from an old Palm Pilot (resolution is better than an old Palm, but contrast is bad in dim light). The screen is little sufficient that the frequency of page turns is beauteous high. Even in good light, the light gray background is less pleasant than the eggshell background of a printed page. You ought to tell it to sync before you switch it off, if you suppose the feature permitting you to pick up where you left off using other widgets to work correctly. The copy shelter prevents you from using the files on anything other than Kindle software or devices.

Vs iPad:
IPad is a lot better for magazines, reference materials, and illustrated materials. Kindle is worlds better for reading novels. IPad is finelooking heavy, making it more difficult to hold in your hand or carry with you everywhere. Kindle is much more portable and requiring little effort to hold. IPad has some amazing children’s books and magazines, which take vantage of it is multimedia features. IPad is unreadable in sunlight and glare is bad in bright light. Kindle is as good as a printed page in bright light. Ipad serves as a originative tool, a computing tool, a gaming tool, and a communicating tool. Kindle is only a novel machine. I don’t regret buying either one of them. An iPad won’t replace books, but a Kindle can, if the book is text-only.

I highly commend this device at it is new low price if you are a frequent reader of novels. I love my kindle. Just don’t suppose it to be more than it is. Leave the magazines and such to the tablet computers.

1288 of 1311 humans found the following review helpful.
4I Wanted a Dedicated E-Reader, and That’s What I Got
By Matthew E. Coenen
I’m a first-time Kindle owner, so I have not one thing to “compare” the latest Kindle to. I don’t own a Nook. I don’t own an iPad (and, in any case, that’s comparing apples to oranges). I don’t have a Sony e-reader. ‘

This will be a short, simple review.

I received my Kindle in regards to a week ago and haven’t been competent to put it down.

Things I like regarding my Kindle?
1. The e-ink display is amazing.
2. Using the 5-way controller is simple and effective.
3. Page turn speeds are rapidly and without delay than I thought they would be.
4. It’s lightweight, even with the attached cover (I have an Amazon cover with a built-in light)
5. Page-turning buttons are quiet and well-placed.
6. Recharge time is fast.
7. I may order a book and start out reading it in less than 60 seconds. Nice!
8. Portability… I may take 3,000 books with me when I travel for work and not require further and added suitcases or baggage fees.

Things I’m not too keen on?
1. Buttons are too close together and are laid out oddly.
2. Lack of person number buttons is frustrating.
3. Power button on the bottom? Not a bad thing. Just an odd thing. (Same for the headphone input). I commonly rest the “bottom” of a book on my lap when I read.

Things I hope modify in the future?
1. How books are organized… When I put a book in a collection (which is genuinely a “tag”), it still appears in the main list. It’s not actually “moved”, it’s merely associated.
2. The look of the main screen. I’d like “folders” or a heap of other way to display “collections”.
3. Ability to manufacture personal “screen savers.”
4. E-book pricing, though Amazon has little control over this. Still, most titles are the same price as or less than their hardback/paperback counterparts. (And I’m not opposed to paying more for comfortableness and portability).

Things that don’t bother me regarding other reviews?
1. The browser is experimental. Amazon has invented a committed e-reader, and it’s meant to be used to read. Period. Not browse the web. If you want to browse the web, get a computer — not an e-reader.
2. The Kindle is not an mP3 player, either. Yes, it’s nice to have a heap of classical music playing in the background while I read, but I don’t need to see the title of the song, album art, etc. (And you may skip from track to track on the Kindle using shortcut keys).
3. Lack of a “color” or “touch” screen.

In summary, for $139, I’m rather thrilled with my buy and have arleady read multiple books on it. In fact, I think I’ve read more in the past week than I’ve read in the past month.

See all 23615 client reviews…

Comments are closed.